Artificial Intelligence Insights for Organisations

Is your AI lying to you? The real business cost of AI hallucinations   

Skills Lab Team
11 June 2026 Published: 11.06.26, Modified: 11.06.2026 10:06:12

AI is transforming business operations, with 88% of organisations now reporting regular AI use delivering productivity gains through automation and faster software development. However, these benefits come with risks, particularly the threat of AI hallucinations. This risk is present in nearly every AI-powered tool and is frequently overlooked by senior leadership.

Research shows AI hallucinations cost organisations $67.4 billion globally, and the impact is expected to rise as adoption increases.

For businesses, it can become a serious reputational, legal, and financial liability. This is the unavoidable cost of deploying AI without robust human oversight.  While the AI revolution is well underway, the real barrier remains people. Our research shows 32% of organisations say they don’t have the specialist skills required to adopt AI.

What is an AI hallucination?     

AI hallucinations occur when a large language model generates content that is factually wrong, misleading, or invented with full confidence.

LLMs such as ChatGPT and Copilot do not possess knowledge in the human sense. They base their answer on data patterns. While outputs can be useful, the model rarely signals uncertainty when it is incorrect. It simply generates a plausible answer and continues.

The root causes of AI hallucinations often lie in biases within training data, algorithmic errors, misinformation in data sources, or limitations inherent in AI models.

Employees now lose the equivalent of 51 workdays a year due to technology friction, and while 92% of workers say AI boosts their productivity, the average employee spends roughly 4.5 hours a week verifying AI outputs.

FDM Consultant, Rachit Khanna, works as a full-stack developer for a global banking client. He routinely uses AI tools at work for a range of tasks from code generation to creating presentations. Whilst the tools are useful for certain tasks, he has to review any output that the AI tool generates to check for hallucinations.

“AI is a good tool to use for 70 -80 percent of the time, but you have to review the output to see if it’s accurate or not.”

Where AI hallucinations hit business data hardest    

Financial analysis and reporting

When AI generates financial figures, such as revenue, growth rates, or ratios, there is no inherent guarantee of accuracy.

For example, AI might misread financial data to produce a plausible-looking but incorrect earnings-per-share figure or invent a financial statistic. If left undetected, such errors flow directly into investment models, board presentations, and strategic decisions.

Data extraction and processing

AI-powered data extraction, including scraping, document processing, OCR, and structured data creation, is one of the most widely used business applications, according to enterprise adoption reports. For example, an extraction tool that reads “$2,500/month” as “$2,500” may pass automated checks but still generate incorrect data. These repricing algorithms may use misidentified competitor prices, prospect lists may include fabricated contacts, and market analyses might rely on distorted data.

Legal research and compliance

Research found that large language models hallucinate 75% of legal court queries. Even purpose-built legal AI tools show substantial error rates. More and more AI-generated fake legal citations are being initiated by practising lawyers in court, with sanctions exceeding $10,000 for several of them.

Customer-facing AI systems

AI chatbots can confidently provide incorrect information about return policies, fabricated delivery dates, or misleading product details; as a result, companies can incur complaints, financial losses, and reputational harm.

Why hallucinations are so dangerous

Simon Dale, FDM Skills Lab Coach, believes, “For businesses, the risk isn’t that AI gets things wrong occasionally, it’s that the output looks authoritative enough for people to act on it without checking or reiterating.”

He shares, “If an employee pastes a hallucinated statistic into a client report or a policy document, the reputational and compliance cost lands on the organisation, not the AI tool. That’s why AI literacy matters as much as AI adoption. AI is not a magic bullet, more a helpful colleague who is prone to making mistakes as much as any of us. Always check the output is my mantra!”

This creates a dangerous reversal: the more confidently an AI answers, the less you should trust it. Without human review, businesses cannot reliably distinguish between what’s factual and what isn’t. Automated checks cannot detect these errors, as they appear convincing but are fundamentally incorrect. This poses a severe strategic threat to business outcomes.

Preventing AI hallucinations 

The best way to mitigate the impact of AI hallucinations is to stop them before they happen.

Simon shares, “Treat every AI output as a first draft, not a final answer. The simplest habit to build is to generate with AI, verify with a source. Trust your own instincts and professional knowledge and ask AI itself for sources and citations whenever it feels necessary.”

Here are some steps you can take to keep your AI models functioning optimally: 

Use high-quality training data

Generative AI models rely on input data to complete tasks, so the quality and relevance of training datasets will dictate the model’s behaviour and the quality of its outputs.

Simon recommends, “Where possible, ground the model in your own data. Paste in the source material, attach the document, and give AI the facts to work with. An LLM is far less likely to hallucinate when it’s summarising something you’ve provided than when it’s generating from scratch.”

Define the purpose your AI model will serve

Spelling out how you will use the AI model, along with any limitations on its use, will help reduce the risk of hallucinations. Your team or organisation should establish the chosen AI system’s responsibilities and limitations.

Use data templates

Data templates provide teams a predefined format, increasing the likelihood that an AI model will generate outputs that align with prescribed guidelines. Relying on data templates ensures consistent output and reduces the likelihood of faulty results.

Limit responses

AI models often hallucinate because they lack constraints that limit possible outcomes. To prevent this issue and improve the overall consistency and accuracy of results, define boundaries for AI models using filtering tools and/or clear probabilistic thresholds.

Test and refine the system continually

Testing your AI model rigorously before use is vital to preventing hallucinations. It can improve the system’s overall performance and enable users to adjust and/or retrain the model as data ages and evolves.

Simon shares, “Be specific in your prompts. Vague questions invite vague, sometimes invented, answers. Tell the model exactly what you need, what format you want in the output, and instruct AI to flag anything it’s uncertain about and return any uncertainties/ambiguities as questions. Ask for further data/clarification rather than guess. The information that AI holds about the individual user in its managed memory can also contribute to reducing hallucinations in the output.”

Rely on human oversight

Ensuring a human being validates and reviews AI outputs is a final backstop to prevent hallucination. Involving human oversight ensures that, if the AI hallucinates, a human will be available to filter and correct it.

Building a hallucination-resistant workforce    

For AI to be effective for businesses, companies should apply the same evaluation process to AI outputs as they would to any other decision-making process.

Instead of taking AI outputs at face value, employees should be encouraged to double-check responses against internal data, third-party sources, or subject-matter experts. Teams can also compare outputs across multiple LLMs to ensure they’re sourcing the best responses.

Effective human oversight doesn’t mean manually reviewing every AI output. It means applying human judgement strategically at the points where hallucinations cause the most damage.

Successful companies will implement appropriate checks and balances in LLM usage across their organisations.

How FDM can help    

At FDM, we believe in humans and AI, together.

The potential of AI is huge. So is the risk of deploying it without the right expertise to implement, manage, and scale it effectively.

FDM Consultants integrate seamlessly into your teams and accelerate your timeline from pilot to production.

Contact us to learn how our AI-ready consultants can help your organisation’s AI transformation.

Yes
No